Full-Size Revolver

Ruger Redhawk vs Smith & Wesson Model 686 PLUS - Distinguished Combat Magnum

A full-size revolver comparison between Ruger Redhawk and Smith & Wesson 686 for buyers wanting robust double-action platforms.

Ruger Redhawk

Ruger Redhawk

5044 • UPC 736676050444

$1,001.89MSRP $1,449
View full specs →
Smith & Wesson Model 686 PLUS - Distinguished Combat Magnum

Smith & Wesson Model 686 PLUS - Distinguished Combat Magnum

164194 • UPC 022188641943

Special PriceMSRP $1,039
View full specs →

Side-by-Side Specs

SpecificationRuger RedhawkSmith & Wesson Model 686 PLUS - Distinguished Combat Magnum
TypeRevolver: Double ActionRevolver: Double Action
Caliber.44 Remington Magnum.357 Magnum
ActionDouble ActionDouble Action
Capacity67
Barrel Length4.2"4"
Overall Length9.5"9.5625"
Weight47 oz38.5 oz
FinishStainless SteelSatin Stainless Finish
Stock / GripBlack Hogue MonogripSynthetic Grip
SightsFront: Ramp, Rear: AdjustableFront: Red Ramp, Rear: Adjustable
SafetyTransfer Bar SystemInternal Lock
MSRP$1,449$1,039

Rows marked with have different values

Features

Smith & Wesson Model 686 PLUS - Distinguished Combat Magnum

Square Butt, Forged Hammer And Trigger, Drilled and Tapped

Who This Comparison Is Really For

This comparison is for shoppers who want a full-size double-action revolver and are deciding between the Ruger Redhawk and the Smith & Wesson Model 686 PLUS. It makes sense when you already know you want a serious large-frame wheelgun, but still need to compare whether your shortlist should lean toward outright strength and bulk or toward a more balanced premium .357-style setup.

It is especially useful because these two revolvers overlap in broad use cases even though they often appeal to different instincts. Both can make sense for range use, trail use, and general revolver ownership, so the real question is which platform looks stronger once the size, weight, and current pricing differences are visible.

Key Tradeoffs Between Ruger Redhawk and Smith & Wesson Model 686 PLUS

The key tradeoff in this matchup is brute-strength positioning versus a more balanced premium-shooting revolver feel. The Ruger Redhawk usually attracts buyers who want a large, exceptionally robust revolver with a hard-use reputation, while the Smith & Wesson Model 686 PLUS appeals to shoppers who want a full-size double-action revolver that still feels substantial but carries a somewhat more refined and mainstream .357 identity.

That makes the spec table especially important. Barrel length, weight, overall dimensions, and capacity are likely to be some of the most meaningful rows on the page because those figures show whether the Redhawk's heavier-duty profile is actually beneficial for your intended use or whether the 686 PLUS is the better balance of shootability, size, and practicality.

Current pricing matters as well. Since this page includes updated pricing and current offers, shoppers should compare actual listed prices and active configurations rather than assume the larger revolver or the more familiar premium .357 option automatically offers the better value. In a comparison like this, price can quickly separate two otherwise appealing revolvers.

Bottom Line For A Shortlist

Keep the Ruger Redhawk on your shortlist if you want a more brute-force full-size revolver with a strong heavy-duty identity. Keep the Smith & Wesson Model 686 PLUS in the mix if you want a competing full-size revolver that leans more toward balanced shootability and a classic premium .357 profile.

The better fit depends on how you weigh strength, refinement, dimensions, and current price inside the full-size revolver category.

Related Resources

Use these guides, FAQs, and category pages if you want more context before you commit to this matchup as your final shortlist.

More Comparisons